Samsung Galaxy A54 vs Xiaomi Poco F5

introduction

Whereas it is at all times enjoyable to take a look at flagship smartphones and marvel at their tech highlights, the reality is that most individuals will find yourself shopping for an reasonably priced mid-range gadget. It is the mid-caps that drive quantity in right this moment’s market, and issues can understandably get very aggressive.

That is very true within the hotly contested €300-€400 worth vary the place Samsung Galaxy A54 and Xiaomi Poco F5 compete with one another. Each are nice telephones on paper, and so they every have their very own benefits. Moreover, each units appear to be available in most markets around the globe.

And whereas the A54 is the clear winner within the recognition division, at the very least in response to our specs pages, there’s lots to discover on this comparability. Try how their full spec sheets evaluate or take a look at our editor’s score beneath.

Dimension comparability

The 2 telephones are nearly equivalent in dimension, though the Poco F5 clearly has a dimension benefit over the Galaxy A54. It includes a 6.67-inch show with a 20:9 ratio, in comparison with the Galaxy’s 6.4-inch show with a facet ratio of 19.5:9. Regardless of this, the Poco F5 is not terribly longer than the Galaxy A54, measuring 161.1mm, in comparison with 158.2mm on the Samsung.

Nonetheless, the Galaxy A54 is barely wider and thicker than the Poco F5 – 76.7mm, in comparison with the thickness of 75mm and eight.2mm, in comparison with 7.9mm respectively. That is apart from the truth that each units have the identical dimension, which is a 5000mAh battery.

Regardless of its bigger display, the Poco F5 is considerably lighter than the Galaxy A54. It weighs 181 grams, in comparison with 202 grams for the Samsung cellphone. Maybe the massive distinction stems from the truth that the Galaxy A54 has a Gorilla Glass 5 again, which weighs greater than the plastic again panel on the Poco F5.

Talking of supplies and construct high quality, the Poco F5 additionally has Gorilla Glass 5 entrance glass, and each units sport a plastic mid-frame.

Nonetheless, the Galaxy A54 has the coveted IP67 score, whereas the Poco caught with the extra fundamental IP53 score.

View comparability

As talked about earlier, the 2 telephones have a noticeable distinction in display dimension. The Galaxy A54 is extra compact, with a diagonal of 6.4 inches and a facet ratio of 19.5:9. All of the whereas, the Poco F5 measures 6.67 inches with a facet ratio of 20:9.

Each shows have FullHD+ decision and look very related by way of sharpness. Each telephones managed very near the 1000nit mark in our assessments by way of most brightness. This makes it equally sensible even in vivid out of doors situations.

Most brightness is essential for HDR playback; Each telephones have HDR help on their screens. The Poco F5 is barely forward of the Galaxy A54 on this class because it helps Dolby Imaginative and prescient along with the HDR10 and HDR10+ requirements that each telephones meet.

Samsung has a stable repute with regards to coloration accuracy and copy. The A54 does not disappoint on this division, doing notably properly with the sRGB coloration area. The Poco F5 is not far behind by way of decision, and has the apparent advantage of providing a 12-bit panel in comparison with Samsung’s 8-bit panel. This implies there are fewer coloration bands in some troublesome photos.

Each telephones help a most refresh price of 120Hz and deal with automated refresh price switching properly to steadiness smoothness and battery endurance.

battery life

Galaxy A54 and Poco F5 are each geared up with large 5000mAh battery packs. The pair carried out very equally in our battery stress check.

There are marginal variations in how the 2 fared in our assessments. For instance, the Galaxy A54 carried out barely higher within the Wi-Fi net searching portion of the check. However actually, it isn’t even price mentioning. For all intents and functions, the 2 telephones supply equivalent battery endurance.

Delivery pace

Though the battery endurance could also be uneven between the 2 telephones, there’s a clear winner with regards to charging pace. This may be the Xiaomi Poco F5 with its 67W quick charging answer. In the meantime, the Galaxy A54 is caught with solely 25W PD+PPS charging.

The distinction in charging price is apparent. Thirty minutes on the charger will get the Samsung as much as 56%, whereas the Poco F5 reaches 83%.

A full cost takes simply over an hour on the A54 and just below 50 minutes on the Poco F5.

Additionally it is price noting that the Poco F5 additionally comes with a 67W quick charger, whereas the Galaxy A54 is bought with out a charger.

Speaker check

The Galaxy A54 and Poco F5 each have stereo audio system. The Galaxy makes use of the earpiece because the secondary entrance channel for a hybrid setup, whereas the Poco has a speaker grille for the audio output on the prime of the cellphone as properly, making the audio output extra balanced.

The Poco F5 additionally has a slight edge over the Galaxy A54 by way of loudness, getting an excellent end in our assessments in comparison with Samsung’s good rating.

There may be not a lot distinction between the 2 telephones by way of precise sound high quality. Each have slight distortion within the highs, lack bass and have typically clear mids and vocals. Maybe Xiaomi will as soon as once more have a slight benefit.

One other characteristic of the Poco F5 is the three.5mm audio jack, which is absent from the Galaxy A54.

efficiency

Samsung is betting by itself in-house Exynos 1380 chipset for the Galaxy A54. It’s a 5nm chip with an octa-core CPU configuration consisting of 4 x 2.4GHz Cortex-A78 and 4 x 2.0GHz Cortex-A55. The GPU is Mali-G68 MP5.

Galaxy A54 begins with a base configuration of 128GB and 6GB of RAM. Nevertheless it can be bought in 128GB and 8GB RAM, 256GB and 6GB RAM and 256GB and 8GB RAM.

You will need to be aware right here that the Galaxy A54 comes with expandable storage. There is a hybrid microSD card slot, so you may have to decide on between a smaller second SIM and extra storage, however at the very least the choice is there, which is greater than might be stated concerning the Poco F5.

That is about the one benefit the Galaxy A54 has on this division, because the Poco F5 is supplied with the considerably extra highly effective Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset. It’s a 4nm half with an octa core CPU configuration consisting of 1 x 2.91GHz Cortex-X2, 3 x 2.49GHz Cortex-A710 and 4 x 1.8GHz Cortex-A510. The onboard GPU is Adreno 725.

The Poco F5 could lack expandable storage, but it surely comes with 256GB of UFS 3.1 even in its base variant, which additionally has 8GB of RAM. You will get the 12GB mannequin in addition to the 256GB one too, for a premium.

Xiaomi
f5 bit

Antoto
931,174
Jake Bunch 6
1,639 single core
Jake Bunch 6
4,348 multi-core

As talked about earlier, the Poco F5 has considerably extra uncooked energy than the Galaxy A54. This consists of CPU and GPU efficiency. Nonetheless, we can’t say that the Galaxy A54 is powered. It really works easily with none noticeable hiccups.

Digicam comparability

The Galaxy A54 and Poco F5 have very related digicam setups in most respects. Samsung presents a 50MP principal digicam, f/1.8, 1/1.56″, 1.0µm, with OIS and PDAF. As for the Poco F5, its principal digicam is 64 MP, f/1.8 unit, 1/2 inch, 0.7 µm. Pixel and in addition OIS and PDAF.

Each telephones even have a devoted wide-angle digicam with fastened focus – 12MP on the Samsung cellphone and 8MP on the Xiaomi cellphone. Each telephones even have a devoted macro digicam on the again – 5MP on the Samsung and 2MP on the Xiaomi. As we stated, these are utterly comparable settings.

The Galaxy A54 presents a 32MP selfie digicam, which is able to capturing 4K video, in comparison with the 16MP 1080p selfie discovered within the Poco F5. Sadly, not one of the selfie cameras have auto focus.

Each telephones take nice daylight photographs with good element and color.

Samsung Galaxy A54: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 50 MP

Extra samples and detailed evaluation might be present in our Galaxy A54 assessment.

Xiaomi Poco F5: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 64 MP

Extra samples and detailed evaluation might be present in our Poco F5 assessment.

Each additionally supply extremely environment friendly 2x zoom photographs as a crop from the principle digicam. Daytime video is nice from each units, too.

Regardless of the disparity in selfie decision, each telephones supply aggressive selfies as properly.

Each telephones additionally handle to shine properly in low-light pictures, which is spectacular. Total, neither cellphone will disappoint within the digicam division, as each telephones are filled with highly effective cameras.

This is a take a look at how the Galaxy A54’s principal digicam compares by way of picture high quality to the Poco F5’s in our picture comparability software.

This is how the Galaxy A54’s principal digicam compares in video high quality to the Poco F5 in our video comparability software.

verdict

It’s troublesome to crown one among these two telephones as higher than the opposite as a result of they differ considerably of their priorities. For instance, Samsung has clearly paid extra consideration to the construct high quality and ingress safety of the Galaxy A54. This isn’t to say that the Poco F5 is a flimsy gadget, removed from it. Nonetheless, if you happen to’re somewhat extra careless about your cellphone, you may want the added peace of thoughts that Gorilla Glass 5 supplies on each side of the cellphone and the IP67 ingress safety Galaxy supplies.

Samsung additionally has expandable storage to its credit score and arguably a barely extra polished digicam expertise. It is undoubtedly a greater selfie digicam, able to capturing 4K video.

However, Xiaomi appears to have centered extra on providing higher {hardware} worth for cash with the Poco F5. Though it’s not higher than the one on the Galaxy, its display presents higher colours and help for Dolby Imaginative and prescient. And it outperforms the Galaxy A54 in efficiency by a big margin. Moreover, whereas each units are practically equivalent by way of battery endurance, the added comfort of Xiaomi’s a lot sooner charging is plain.

Finally, the choice between these two premium mid-value firms ought to be a private one – relying by yourself priorities and even model choice. We are able to confidently say that neither of them will disappoint you, and each are extremely really helpful units.